The National Reform Movement
During this period of religious revival
many people believe Whitby's postmillennium theory that the world was
becoming better and better until Christ would come.21
However, with the coming of the American Civil War, the churches saw
that the nation was not "co-operating with God" and sought to
bring the country back to God. Instead of relying upon personal
conviction or the doctrine of election, this reform tended towards
government legislation to prepare the world for Christ's reign.
In 1863, the first National Reform
Association convention was held. The principle speaker stated that the
Civil War resulted because of America's failure to acknowledge God's
authority and declare itself a "Christian nation."22
This movement set out to purify the
nation by intitiating a constitutional amendment acknowledging the
authority of God.23
Although this amendment was to be defeated, it was the beginning of a
drive to coerce the nation to unite "under God."
With the defeat of the amendment, there
came a move to restrict work and close businesses on Sunday. Here the
reformers were more successful. These "blue laws" were passed
by different states which cause considerable persecution of several
denominations.24
The opposers say that the real issue was the uniting of church with
state which would limit the freedom of others.
The struggle came to a crescendo in
1888 with the alliance of several church reform groups bent upon
national Sunday legislation. This alliance was made of various
temperance organizations as well as missionary societies of the
Methodists, Baptists, Presbyterians, the Reformed church and others.25
When this coalition introduced it bill, most of the religious community
appeared to be in favor of such actions. This bill, the Blair Bill,
failed to pass in Congress by a single vote. It was followed by the
Breckenridge bill of 1890, which would have prevented any work to be
done on Sunday in the District of Columbia.
Finally, there was a bill that did pass
in 1892 that required that "no exposition or exhibition for which
appropriation is made by Congress shall be opened on Sunday.26
In taking these steps, the popular
churches revealed their relationship to the concepts of the law and the
gospel. Instead of preaching the gospel and allowing the Holy Spirit to
do His work through personal conviction, they were trying to legislate
it. By doing so, they exhibited a spirit quite contrary to the Bible.
The situation is made clear in the words of Mario Cuomo, the present
governor of New York State. During the 1984 elections, the issue of
abortion was transformed into an important debate. Cuomo was upset that
the Catholic church was attacking a woman candidate's spiritual
commitment, because she refused to encourage legislation of her church's
line on abortion. His response to this was, "Are we asking
government to make criminal what we believe is sinful because we
ourselves can't stop committing the sin?"27
This action would suggest that if a church seeks outside help to make
people good, the reason might well be due to the lack of spiritual depth
inside. It would also reveal the church's understanding of law and
grace, law and the gospel, and covenantal living. It is interesting to
note that the opponents of this movement recognized that the leaders of
this National Reform Association were all Reformed Presbyterians and the
theological base was deeply involved with the covenant concepts of the
Reformed tradition.28
|