By what means was Christ made flesh? Through what means was He partaker of human
nature?—Exactly the same means as are all of us partakers: all of the children of men. For it is written: "As the children [of the man]
are partakers of flesh and blood, He also Himself likewise took part of the same."
Likewise signifies "in the like way," "thus," "in the same way." So He partook of "the same" flesh and blood that
men have in the same way that men partake of it. Men partake of it by birth. So "likewise" did He. Accordingly, it
is written, "Unto us a Child is born."
Accordingly, it is further written: "God sent forth His Son, made of a woman."
Galatians 4:4. He, being made of a woman in this world, in the nature of things He was made of the only kind of woman that this world knows.
But why must He be made of a woman? why not of a
man?—For the simple reason that to be made of a man would not bring Him close enough to mankind as mankind is, under sin. He was made of a woman in order that
He might come, in the very uttermost, to where human nature is in its sinning.
In order to do this, He must be made of a woman, because the woman, not the man, was first and originally in
the transgression. For "Adam was not deceived, but the woman being deceived was in the transgression." 1
To have been made only of the descent of man would have been to come short of the full breadth of the field of
sin, because the woman had sinned and sin was thus in the world before the man sinned.
Christ was thus made of a woman in order that He might meet the great world of sin at its very fountain head of
entrance into this world. To have been made otherwise than of a woman would have been to come short of this
and so would have been only to miss completely the redemption of men from sin.
It was "the Seed of the woman" that was to bruise the serpent's head; and it was only as "the seed of the
woman" and "made of a woman" that He could meet the serpent on his own ground, at the very point of the
entrance of sin into this world.
It was the woman who, in this world, was originally in the
transgression. It was the woman by whom sin originally entered. Therefore, in the redemption of the children of men from sin, He who would be the Redeemer must go
back of the man to meet the sin that was in the world before the man sinned.
This is why He who came to redeem was "made of a woman." By being made of a woman He could trace sin to
the very fountain head of its original entry into the world by the woman. And thus, in finding sin in the world and
uprooting it from the world from its original entrance into the world till the last vestige of it shall be swept from the
world, in the very nature of things He must partake of human nature as it is since sin entered.
Otherwise, there was no kind of need whatever that He should be "made of a woman." If He were not to come
into closest contact with sin as it is in the world, as it is in human nature; if He were to be removed one single
degree from it as it is in human nature, then He need not have been "made of a woman."
But as He was made of a woman—not of a man; as He was made of the one by whom sin entered in its very
origin into the world—and not made of the man, who entered into the sin after the sin had entered into the world;
this demonstrates beyond all possibility of fair question that between Christ and sin in this world and between
Christ and human nature as it is under sin in the world there is no kind of separation, even to the shadow of a
single degree. He was made flesh; he was made to be sin. He was made flesh as flesh is and only as flesh is in
this world and was made to be sin only as sin is.
And this must He do to redeem lost mankind. For Him to be separated a single degree or a shadow of a single
degree in any sense from the nature of those whom He came to redeem would be only to miss everything.
Therefore, as He was made "under the law," because they are under the law whom He would redeem, and as
He was made a curse, because they are under the curse whom He would redeem, and as He was made sin,
because they are sinners—"sold under sin"—whom He would redeem, precisely so He must be made flesh and
"the same" flesh and blood, because they are flesh and blood whom He would redeem and must be made "of a
woman," because sin was in the world first by and in the woman.
It is thoroughly understood that in His birth Christ did partake of the nature of
Mary—the "woman" of whom He was "made." But the carnal mind is not willing to allow that God in His perfection of holiness could endure to
come to men where they are in their sinfulness. Therefore endeavor has been made to escape the
consequences of this glorious truth, which is the emptying of self, by inventing a theory that the nature of the
virgin Mary was different from the nature of the rest of mankind; that her flesh was not exactly such flesh as is
that of all mankind. This invention sets up that by some special means Mary was made different from the rest of
human beings, especially in order that Christ might be becomingly born of her.
If He were not of the same flesh as are those whom He came to redeem, then there is no sort of use of His
being made flesh at all. More than this: Since the only flesh that there is in this wide world which He came to
redeem is just the poor, sinful, lost, human flesh that all mankind have; if this is not the flesh that he was made,
then He never really came to the world which needs to be redeemed. For if he came in a human nature different
from that which human nature in this world actually is, then, even though He were in the world, yet for any
practical purposes in reaching man and helping him, he was as far from him as if He had never come, for, in
that case, in His human nature He was just as far from man and just as much of another world as if He had never
come into this world at all.
This invention has culminated in what is known as the Roman Catholic dogma of the Immaculate Conception.
Many Protestants, if not the vast majority of them as well as other non-Catholics, think that the Immaculate
Conception refers to the conception of Jesus by the virgin Mary. But this is altogether a mistake. It refers not at
all to the conception of Christ by Mary but to the conception of Mary herself by her mother.
The official and "infallible" doctrine of the Immaculate Conception, as solemnly defined as an article of faith, by
Pope Pius IX, speaking ex cathedra on the 8th of December 1854 is as
By the authority of our Lord Jesus Christ of the blessed apostles Peter and Paul, and by our own authority, we
declare, pronounce, and define that the doctrine which holds that the most blessed Virgin Mary, in the first
instant of her conception, by a special grace and privilege of Almighty God, in view of the merits of Jesus
Christ, the Saviour of mankind, was preserved free from all stain of original sin, has been revealed by God, and
therefore is to be firmly and steadfastly believed by all the faithful.
Wherefore, if any shall presume, which may God avert, to think in their heart otherwise then has been defined by
us, let them know, and moreover understand, that they are condemned by their own judgment, that they have
made shipwreck as regards the faith, and have fallen away from the unity of the
Church.—Catholic Belief, page 214.
This conception is defined by Catholic writers
The ancient writing, "De Nativitate Christi," found in St. Cyprian's works says: Because (Mary) being "very
different from the rest of mankind, human nature, but not sin, communicated itself to her."
Theodore, patriarch of Jerusalem, said in the second council of Nice, that Mary "is truly the mother of God, and
virgin before and after childbirth; and she was created in a condition more sublime and glorious than that of all
natures, whether intellectual or corporeal."— Id., pages 216, 217.
This plainly puts the nature of Mary entirely beyond any real likeness or relationship to mankind or human nature
as it is. Having this clearly in mind, let us follow this invention in its next step. Thus it is, as given in the words of
We affirm that the Second Person of the Blessed Trinity, the Word of God, who in His divine nature is, from all
eternity, begotten of the Father, consubstantial with Him, was in the fulness of time again begotten, by being
born of the virgin, thus taking to himself from her maternal womb a human nature of the same substance with
As far as the sublime mystery of the incarnation can be reflected in the natural order, the blessed Virgin, under
the overshadowing of the Holy Ghost, by communicating to the Second Person of the adorable Trinity, as
mothers do, a true human nature of the same substance with her own, is thereby really and truly His
mother.—Faith of Our Fathers, pages 198, 199.
Now put these two things together. First, we have the nature of Mary defined as being not only "very different
from the rest of mankind," but "more sublime and glorious than all natures:" thus putting her
infinitely beyond any real likeness or relationship to mankind as we really are.
Next, we have Jesus described as taking from her a human nature of the same substance as hers.
From this theory it therefore follows as certainly as that two and two make four, that in His human nature the
Lord Jesus is "very different" from the rest of mankind; indeed, His nature is not human nature at all.
Such is the Roman Catholic doctrine concerning the human nature of Christ. The Catholic doctrine of the human
nature of Christ is simply that that nature is not human nature at all, but divine: "more sublime and glorious than
all natures." It is that in His human nature Christ was so far separated from mankind as to be utterly unlike that of
mankind, that His was a nature in which He could have no sort of fellow-feeling with mankind.
But such is not the faith of Jesus. The faith of Jesus is that "as the children are partakers of flesh and blood, He
also Himself likewise took part of the same."
The faith of Jesus is that God sent "His own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh."
The faith of Jesus is that "in all things it behooved Him to be made like unto His brethren.
The faith of Jesus is that He "Himself took our infirmities" and was touched "with the feeling of our infirmities,"
being tempted in all points like as we are. If He was not as we are, He could not possibly be tempted "like as
we are." But He was "in all points tempted like as we are." Therefore He was "in all points" "like as we are."
In the quotations of Catholic faith which in this chapter we have cited, we have presented the faith of Rome as to
the human nature of Christ and of Mary. In the second chapter of Hebrews and kindred texts of Scripture there is
presented—and in these studies we have endeavored to reproduce as there
presented—the faith of Jesus as to the human nature of Christ.
The faith of Rome as to the human nature of Christ and Mary and of ourselves springs from that idea of the
natural mind that God is too pure and too holy to dwell with us and in us in our sinful human nature; that sinful as
we are, we are too far off for Him in His purity and holiness to come to us just as we are.
faith—the faith of Jesus—is that, far off from God as we are in our sinfulness, in our human nature which
He took, He has come to us just where we are; that, infinitely pure and holy as He is, and sinful, degraded, and
lost as we are, He in Christ by His Holy Spirit will willingly dwell with us and in us to save us, to purify us, and to
make us holy.
The faith of Rome is that we must be pure and holy in order that God shall dwell with us at all.
The faith of Jesus is that God must dwell with us and in us in order that we shall be holy or pure at all.
The Law of Heredity
"The Word was made flesh."
"When the fulness of the time was come, God sent forth His Son, made of a woman."
"And the Lord hath laid on Him the iniquity of us all."
We have seen that in His being made of a woman, Christ reached sin at the very fountain head of its entrance
into this world and that He must be made of a woman to do this. Also there was laid upon Him the iniquity, in the
actual sins, of us all.
Thus all the sin of this world, from its origin in the world to the end of it in the world, was laid upon
Him—both sin as it is in itself and sin as it is when committed by us; sin in its tendency and sin in the act: sin as it is hereditary
in us, uncommitted by us; and sin as it is committed by us.
Only thus could it be that there should be laid upon Him the iniquity of us all. Only by His subjecting Himself to
the law of heredity could He reach sin in full and true measure as sin truly is. Without this there could be laid
upon Him our sins which have been actually committed, with the guilt and condemnation that belong to them.
But beyond this there is in each person, in many ways, the liability to sin inherited from generations back which
has not yet culminated in the act of sinning but which is ever ready, when occasion offers, to blaze forth in the
actual committing of sins. David's great sin is an illustration of this.
Psalm 51:5; 2 Samuel 11:2.
In delivering us from sin, it is not enough that we shall be saved from the sins that we have actually committed;
we must be saved from committing other sins. And that this may be so, there must be met and subdued this
hereditary liability to sin; we must become possessed of power to keep us from
sinning—a power to conquer this liability, this hereditary tendency that is in us to sin.
All our sins which we have actually committed were laid upon Him, were imputed to Him, so that His
righteousness may be laid upon us, may be imputed to us. Also our liability to sin was laid upon Him, in His
being made flesh, in His being born of a woman, of the same flesh and blood as we are, so that His
righteousness might be actually manifested in us as our daily life.
Thus He met sin in the flesh which He took and triumphed over it, as it is written: "God sending His own Son in
the likeness of sinful flesh, and for sin, condemned sin in the flesh." And again: "He is our
peace,…having abolished in His flesh the enmity."
And thus, just as our sins actually committed were imputed to Him that His righteousness might be imputed to
us, so His meeting and conquering in the flesh the liability to sin and in that same flesh manifesting
righteousness, enables us in Him, and Him in us, to meet and conquer in the flesh this same liability to sin and
to manifest righteousness in the same flesh.
And thus it is that for the sins which we have actually committed, for the sins that are past, His righteousness is
imputed to us, as our sins were imputed to Him. And to keep us from sinning His righteousness is imparted to
us in our flesh as our flesh, with its liability to sin, was imparted to Him. Thus He is the complete Saviour. He
saves from all the sins that we have actually committed and saves equally from all the sins that we might commit
dwelling apart from Him.
If He took not the same flesh and blood that the children of men have with its liability to sin, then where could
there be any philosophy or reason of any kind whatever in His genealogy as given in the Scriptures? He was
descended from David; He was descended from Abraham; He was descended from Adam and, by being
made of a woman, He reached even back of Adam to the beginning of sin in the world.
In that genealogy there are
Jehoiakim, who for his wickedness was "buried with the burial of an ass, drawn and
cast forth beyond the gates of Jerusalem" (Jeremiah 22:19); Manasseh, who caused Judah to do "worse than the
heathen;" Ahaz, who "made Judah naked, and transgressed sore against the Lord;"
Rehoboam, who was born of Solomon after Solomon turned from the Lord; Solomon himself, who was born of David and
Bathsheba; there are also Ruth the Moabitess and Rahab; as well as Abraham, Isaac, Jesse,
Asa, Jehoshaphat, Hezekiah, and Josiah: the worst equally with the best. And the evil deeds of even the best are recorded equally with the good.
And in this whole genealogy there is hardly one whose life is written upon at all of whom there is not some
wrong act recorded.
Now it was at the end of such a genealogy as that that "the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us." It was
at the end of such a genealogy as that that He was made of a woman." It was in such a line of descent as that
that God sent "His own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh." And such a descent, such a genealogy, meant
something to Him, as it does to every other man, under the great law that the iniquities of the fathers are visited
upon the children to the third and fourth generations. It meant everything to Him in the terrible
temptations in the wilderness of temptation, as well as all the way through His life in the flesh.
Thus, both by heredity and by imputation, He was "laden with the sins of the world." And, thus laden, at this
immense disadvantage He passed triumphantly over the ground where at no shadow of any disadvantage
whatever, the first pair failed.
By His death He paid the penalty of all sins actually committed, and thus can justly bestow His righteousness
upon all who choose to receive it. And by condemning sin in the flesh, by abolishing in His flesh the enmity, He
delivers from the power of the law of heredity and so can, in righteousness, impart His divine nature and power
to lift above that law, and hold above it, every soul that receives Him.
And so it is written: "When the fulness of the time was come, God sent forth His Son, made of a woman, made
under the law, to redeem them that were under the law, that we might receive the adoption of sons."
Galatians 4:4. And "God sending His own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh, and for [on account of] sin, condemned sin in the
flesh: that the righteousness of the law might be fulfilled in us, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit."
Rom. 8:3,4. And "He is our peace,…having abolished in His flesh the
enmity,…for to make in Himself of twain [God and man] one new man, so making peace."
Ephesians 2:14, 15.
Thus, "in all things it behooved Him to be made like unto His
brethren.…For in that He Himself hath suffered being tempted, He is able to succor them that are tempted."
Whether temptation be from within or from without, He is the perfect shield against it all; and so saves to the
uttermost all who come unto God by Him.
God sending His own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh, Christ taking our nature as our nature is in its sinfulness
and degeneracy, and God dwelling constantly with Him and in Him in that
nature…in this God has demonstrated to all people forever that there is no soul in this world so laden with sins or so lost that God will not gladly dwell
with him and in him to save him from it all and to lead him in the way of the righteousness of God.
And so certainly is his name Emmanuel, which is, "God with us."